Home Page Online Poker Rooms Casino Bonus Online Casinos Casino News Gaming News gaming News Gambling Articles World Series Of Poker No Deposit Bonus
Online Slots
        Gambling Affiliates     |     Gambling Guide     |    Slot Tournaments Finder     |     Poker Pros    |     Recentpoker Twitter
Online Casino
Biggest Casino Bonuses
$22 No Deposit Bonus
SlotsLV no deposit
Betonline Casino
$900 Signup Bonus
Betonline Bonus Code
Bovada Casino (Bodog USA)
$3000 Signup Bonus
Bovada Bonus Code
SlotsPlus Casino
$7000 SignUp Bonus
SlotsPlus First deposit bonus
$767 x2 Signup Bonus
Biggest Poker Bonuses
Bovada Poker (Bodog USA)
$1000 Sign Up Bonus
bovada poker bonus code
$88 No Deposit Bonus
888 Poker no deposit bonus
Party Poker
$500 Sign Up Bonus
PartyPoker no deposit bonus
BetOnline Poker
$900 Sign Up Bonus
Betonline Poker bonus code
USA No Deposit Bonus

No Deposit Bonus : SlotsLv casino currently is offering everyone a $22 no deposit bonus. New Players Only. Fully Cashable. USA and Canadian Players are welcome. Please see our SlotsLv review page for the no deposit bonus info. SlotsLv Review

Best USA Casino Bonus

Big Casino Bonus : All USA Players Welcome: Bovada Casino the #1 USA Online Casino offering all new signups a $3000 table game and slots bonus + weekly cash back. All new accounts qualify thru our link. No codes needed. For full bonus information please see our Bovada Bonus review.


Bovada Casino Bonus Code

High Noon Casino no deposit bonus

Kentucky Updates

Tuesday morning saw a significant turnout of legal representatives in the Frankfort Circuit Court, prepared to argue their position before Judge Thomas Wingate regarding the attempt last week by the state of Kentucky to seize 141 international domain names belonging to online gambling operations.
The legal teams, representing domain owners, registrars and civic organisations concerned about the impact of Kentucky's actions on freedom of speech and the Internet had earlier submitted legal briefs during a 7 day continuance granted by Judge Wingate.
First up was the legal representative for a number of online gambling companies and domain owners, Bill Johnson who delivered an articulate and cogent argument that Kentucky state officials had acted covertly and without giving the state legislature its right to review their initiative.
Johnson gave a factual summary of events to date and claimed that correct public policy was not followed, resulting in an issue where the state and its lawyers were asking the judiciary to legislate, contrary to the law and to public practice.
Lawyers for the Internet Gaming Council surmised that Kentucky officials were trying to hold domain owners to ransom, a reference to earlier comments by the state that its intention in launching the action to seize domains was aimed at getting owners to come forward and agree to block Kentucky players....and pay a fine for offering their products in the state.
The court was given the benefit of an expert description of how domains work, and the arbitrary definition by lawyers for the state of domains as "gambling devices" in terms of Kentucky laws was disputed. Counsel revealed that a mere handful of registrars were actually complying with the court's order to hand over domain certificates, and pointed out that the certificate is of limited practical value in halting operational conduct as the website and IP address remain outside the control of the certificate holder.

Online Vegas

The representative pointed out that the requirements of due process had not been satisfied in the action, with domain owners denied proper notification by the state's servants. The potential for future and wider abuse of the Internet if a decision favouring Kentucky's action was given was emphasised.
iMEGA counsel addressed the definition of "gaming device", suggesting that it was limited to the mechanical gambling devices envisaged by the legislation. No specific updates to the law regarding domains or their inclusion in the "devices" definition had been implemented.
Counsel from the high powered Greenberg Traurig legal firm claimed that the action was flawed because online gambling is not implicitly illegal in the state of Kentucky.
Respected legal expert and author Lawrence Walters said he represented Golden Palace Casino and Golden Casino, who's domains had been impacted by the Kentucky action. He raised questions regarding the use by the state of outside lawyers on a contingency basis, claiming that the state attorney general had not been involved in the process. None of the domain registrars were located in Kentucky, and the action by state officials therefore lacked jurisdiction.
iMEGA's Edward Leyden raised the Constutional issues inherent in the action, specifically the commerce clause in relation to the global nature of Internet business and activity, which was recognised by the US Supreme Court. He argued that individual states may not regulate commerce, especially in the foreign commerce sense, an argument that had prevailed in precedents.
In the issue before the court there had been an attempt to initiate an enforcement measure on entities that were located outside the jurisdiction of the state of Kentucky, and therefore Kentucky does not have the authority to regulate or confiscate domains. In addition, he asserted, the confiscation sought by the state could have the effect of impacting the business activities of individuals in wider jurisdictions where the business concerned was within the law and policies of the governments concerned.
The iMEGA representative said that the Kentucky action is unusual and unprecedented, and went on to question the legal Internet betting taking place on the Kentucky-domiciled Twin horseracing website.  This raised questions of equity in a state where all forms of gambling had not been banned as was the case in Utah, and this again brought into play the commerce clause of the Constitution, which expressly prohibits states from engaging in commercial protectionism through discriminatory practices.
The time had come to dispel the false notion that the owners of the domains were renegades and criminals, he said, pointing out that the domain owner entities were companies that paid taxes, followed rules and were largely regulated by other jurisdictions. Some are publicly listed companies on leading stock exchanges in countries generally accepted as allies of the United States such as the United Kingdom, he said before concluding that the consequences of the Kentucky initiative could be far reaching and disastrous to commerce.
Presenting the Commonwealth of Kentucky argument in support of the action, Chicago lawyer Robert Foote reprised his contention that none of the opponents of the state in this matter had legal standing. None of the domain owners had presented themselves, instead relying on legal surrogates, he said, claiming that the reason for this was fear of cross examination on their revenues and the knowledge that offering online gambling to Kentucky residents was wrong.
He drew the court's attention to the fact that not one domain owner was personally present, pointing out that one lawyer was representing an unidentified registrar, another was speaking for 7 domain owners, and iMEGA for 58 owners. Other legal representatives arguing their cases had declined to identify their clients.
Foote went on to inform the court that the registrar for one online poker site had been directed by the domain owner not to comply with the court's order for certificates to be lodged with the court pending the outcome of the case. This was in defiance of the court's order.  In another case, a registrar had advised that they would lift their lock on certain frozen domain names due to a conviction that the state of Kentucky had no right to force a confiscation. Foote asked how registrars could be persuaded to cooperate.
The Commonwealth's representative pointed to precedents in domain actions, citing the California 9th Circuit Court ruling that a domain name is property that can be seized, and a court decision in the state of Washington involving the Bodog domains, ordered in default to be confiscated in an action with First Technology. Foot also drew attention to enforcement practice in cocaine prosecutions, where seizures are only announced after the fact - clearly an answer to the arguments that domain  owners were denied notice of the state's intentions.
Kentucky's intention was to gain possession of the domains, thus forcing the owners into discussions leading to two goals - blocking Kentucky residents from their websites and paying a fine to the state, he said, emphasising that online gambling is clearly regarded as illegal by the US federal authorities. 
His statement that Kentucky was not trying to regulate free speech triggered a question from Judge Wingate regarding prohibition of advertising, to which Foote responded by saying that online gambling companies used the .net alternative site subterfuge to advertise, and this would not be affected by the confiscation of the .com domains.
By lunchtime the arguments had been heard and Judge Wingate advised that he would need a further 7 days to consider his judgement.

Limited time offer for all our Readers. All Countries. A brand new No Deposit Bonus. No Max Cashout. Claim It Here.

Gambling News :

Playtech Acquires ECM Systems - Online gambling soiftware provider Playtech plc has announced the acquisition of a ninety percent stake in UK bingo software developer ECM Systems for a consideration of GBP 14.9 million.

Marks and Spencer store Manager steals to Gamblie Online - The Cambridge News reports that a 28-year-old manager of a Marks and Spencer store, Martin Trenor, has been jailed for three years for stealing GBP 254,538.11 in shop takings over the course of a year and spending it almost immediately at online gambling websites.

Chinese Gambling crackdown could damage high roller revenue - Fast-moving events this week have seen Australian media reports quoting hundreds of millions of dollars wagered by Chinese high rollers in Aussie land casinos, offset to some extent by Crown claims that this whale gambler" demographic generates only 12 percent of turnover.

EvenBet Open Face Chinese Poker - Open Face Chinese Poker online games provider EvenBet has reported that its Open Face Chinese Poker product is gaining traction with games recently integrated for desktop action at the Malta-licensed operational site Poker Grant.

PartyPoker Millions tournament guarantee Now GBP 6 million - Online poker operator PartyPoker announced Thursday that it is to boost its PartyPoker Millions tournament guarantee by a million sterling to GBP 6 million, claiming it is now the biggest prize pool guarantee in European poker history.

2016 EPT Malta - The European Poker Tour is off to a good start in Malta, with German pro Dietrich Fast claiming a well-earned Euro 174,000 main prize in the Euro 10,000 buy-in Single-Entry Rebuy event.

Novomatic has announced a legal action against Euro Games Technology - Online and land gambling equipment and games provider Novomatic has announced a legal action against Euro Games Technology Ltd., which it claims has unfairly created imitations of its slot games.

Starcraft ProLeague SHutting Down after 14 Years - Announcing the end of the road for the League, once pre-eminent in Asian eSports gaming, the Korean Esports Association blamed ethical scandals and competition for its decline in popularity.

Team Hot Launches - #teamhot The Philippines licensed and GGNetwork-powered online poker operator Natural8 has announced the appointment to its "Team Hot" professional player line-up of Asian poker aces Kitty Kuo, Xuan Liu and Dong Kim.

Netent Q3-2016 Earnings Report - #netent The UK continues to be an important growth driver but the weaker pound had an estimated negative effect of about three percentage points on revenue growth compared to the same quarter last year.

  Top 6 Poker Sites - Editor’s Pick
Poker Room
Bovada Poker
BetOnLine Poker
None Needed
None Needed
Fulltilt Poker Bonus Code Fulltilt Poker
None Needed
$10 ND
888 pacific poker 888Poker
None Needed
PartyPoker PartyPoker
  Top 6 Casino Sites - Editor’s Pick
SlotsPlus Casino
$20 ND
Bovada Casino
MapleCasino Bonus Code MapleCasino
None Needed
Free Spins
$22 ND
Buzzluck Casino
$33 Nd

Casino No Deposit Bonus Copyright © 2004-2016 | | All Rights Reserved. Copyscape Protected No Deposit Bonus Codes

Please Note : Gambing might not be legal in your area. We bring you as an information and gambling news site only. We hope that you find all the information and gambling news found in to your liking. Please tell your friends about us and visit us again soon.